Shinto Shrine Worship
History · Also called: Shinto Shrine Worship Controversy, Shrine Worship Issue, Sinsa Chambae, Shinsa Chambae, Japanese Shrine Worship in Korea, Shinto Shrine Issue
- History
- First draft by AI
- Last edited 2026-10-04
- Encyclopedia home
Shinto shrine worship was a policy under Japanese colonial rule by which the Government-General of Korea compelled Koreans to bow at Shinto shrines (jinja), the sanctuaries of Japanese Shinto. In 1938 the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church adopted a resolution accepting the practice, and the resistance movement that opposed it produced both prisoners and martyrs.
Background
Shinto shrine worship was a policy under Japanese colonial rule by which the Government-General of Korea compelled Koreans to bow at Shinto shrines (jinja), the sanctuaries of Japanese Shinto. The Government-General maintained that the practice was a state ceremony rather than a religious rite. Many Christians, however, regarded it as a violation of the Ten Commandments, which forbid idolatry (Exodus 20:3-5). The requirement was first imposed in schools, and in January 1936 George S. McCune, principal of Soongsil School, was dismissed over the issue. Around the time of the outbreak of the Second Sino-Japanese War in 1937, the requirement was extended to the churches.
Course of Events
- February 1938: The North Pyongan Presbytery became the first Presbyterian presbytery to adopt a resolution endorsing shrine worship. Before the General Assembly convened, 17 of the 23 presbyteries in the country had followed suit. The Methodist Church had accepted the demand for shrine worship even earlier than the Presbyterians.
- September 10, 1938: The 27th General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church of Korea, meeting at Seomunbak Church in Pyongyang with Moderator Hong Taek-ki presiding, adopted a statement declaring that "Shinto shrines are not religious." With police surrounding the assembly hall, only the ayes were called for, the nays were never called, and the motion was declared carried. Immediately after the resolution was adopted, Vice Moderator Kim Kil-chang led the presbytery moderators to the Pyongyang Shrine to pay homage. Opponents of shrine worship, including the Rev. Chu Ki-chol, are reported to have been detained in advance and thus prevented from attending the assembly.
- June–September 1940: The Government-General carried out mass arrests of those who refused shrine worship. Chu Ki-chol, Son Yang-won, Han Sang-dong, Choi Duk-ji, Ahn Ei-sook, and others were imprisoned, and some 2,000 people are reported to have been arrested and imprisoned over the shrine issue. Chu Ki-chol died in prison. The Baptists also refused shrine worship and are reported to have suffered persecution, including the closure of churches.
Outcome and Impact
After liberation, the Presbyterian Church rescinded its shrine worship resolution at the Southern General Assembly (the 32nd) in June 1946. In April 1954 the 39th General Assembly, attended by commissioners from both the North and the South, issued a statement rescinding the resolution of the 27th General Assembly on the motion of the Rev. Kwon Yeon-ho. The assembly also lifted the expulsions and disciplinary measures that had been imposed on those who had refused shrine worship, and it held a prayer meeting of repentance.
During the rebuilding of the church, the conflict between leaders who had participated in shrine worship and the released prisoners (those who had refused and had been freed from prison) became a major point of contention. Hong Taek-ki drew criticism when he explained that he had worshiped at the shrine only to protect the church. In September 1952 the Presbyterian Church in Korea (Kosin) separated, led chiefly by those who had been imprisoned for opposing shrine worship (see Schisms in Korean Presbyterianism).
Assessment
The resolution of the 27th General Assembly is criticized as having been adopted under coercion and in violation of proper parliamentary procedure. It is also regarded as a grave failing in the history of the Korean church. Opinions differ, however, on whether repentance has been sufficient. Some criticize the 1946 rescission for failing to address the questions of apology and responsibility. Others point out that most of the presbyteries that endorsed shrine worship have still not formally rescinded their resolutions or repented. Still others hold that the matter was already settled by the rescission and repentance of the 1954 General Assembly. Some scholars argue that the movement to refuse shrine worship should be understood as both a faith movement and an independence movement.
See also 7
14 sources consulted
- 홍택기 - 위키백과
- 신사참배 강요 - 위키백과
- 참배 - 위키백과
- 신사 참배 문제 확대 - 우리역사넷
- 신사참배 - 우리역사넷
- 신사참배 - 대구역사문화대전
- 일제 강압에 날치기 통과… 결의 당일 20여명 참배 '최악의 날' - 국민일보
- 한국 장로교회 신사참배 결의와 1940년대의 부일과 배교 - 코람데오닷컴
- 전란 후 열린 첫 총회에서 신사참배 취소, 과오 돌이키고 금식 선포 - 한국기독공보
- [역사기획/신사참배 결의 80주년] (2)굴욕의 역사 어떻게 극복할까 - 주간기독신문
- "한국교회가 신사참배 회개했다고?" - 뉴스앤조이
- 광복 80주년, 신사참배의 죄악… 한국교회의 회개는 아직 끝나지 않았다 - 겨자씨신문
- '신사참배 회개 기도회'라는 이름으로, 한국교회와 성도들을 오도하지 말아야 한다 - 뉴스제이
- "'신사참배 거부운동'은 신앙운동이자 독립운동" - 아이굿뉴스
The article was written anew with reference to these sources; their text was not copied.
🚩 Is there a problem with this article? Report it
Log in to report. Reports are reviewed within 24 hours.
Discussion 0
Share your thoughts, other viewpoints or corrections for this article.