Skip to content
Church.wiki

Matthew 22:21: Edit history

Revision #12062

Matthew 22:21

English baseline before localization

Status: approved

Changes from the previous English revision

+ ## Context
+ After Jesus entered Jerusalem, the Pharisees, together with the Herodians, sought to entangle him in his talk by asking whether it was lawful to pay tribute to Caesar, the Roman emperor (Matthew 22:15-17). The question was a trap: if he said it was lawful, he would lose the support of a people who resented Roman rule; if he said it was not, he could be accused of rebellion against Rome. Jesus asked them to show him the tribute money and then asked whose "image and superscription" appeared on the denarius. When they answered, "Caesar's," he gave this reply.
+
+ ## Interpretation
+ - **Two spheres**: This reading distinguishes between the legitimate obligations owed to the state, such as taxes, and the worship and obedience owed to God. Martin Luther's doctrine of the two kingdoms is often cited as a development of this distinction.
+ - **The state under God's sovereignty**: Just as Caesar's "image" was stamped on the coin, the image of God is stamped on human beings; on this reading, the verse implies that people themselves belong to God. The Reformed tradition emphasizes that the authority of the state is itself given by God and is legitimate only within those limits (Romans 13:1).
+ - **Cases of conflict**: When the demands of the state conflict with God's commands, the principle "We ought to obey God rather than men" (Acts 5:29) is cited alongside this verse.
+
+ ## Debates and Issues
+ This verse is frequently invoked in support of the separation of church and state, but views differ on how far the church may speak to political matters. It is cited both by those who hold that the church should keep its distance from politics and by those who argue that, because God's sovereignty extends to every sphere, the church must speak to questions of justice. The Anabaptist tradition has drawn a stricter distinction between state power and the church.
+
+ In Korea, this verse figured in the debate during the Japanese colonial period over whether Shinto shrine worship should be regarded as a civic ceremony or as idolatry. More recently, as the taxation of clergy was about to take effect, some argued that it is consistent with this verse for clergy, as citizens, to pay taxes, while others voiced concern that the measure would infringe on the autonomy of the church.
+
+ ## Related Passages
+ - Romans 13:1-7
+ - Acts 5:29
+ - 1 Peter 2:13-17
+ - Mark 12:13-17


Jesus' reply, "Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the things that are God's." It is the verse most commonly cited in discussions of the relationship between the state and faith, and between the church and politics.

Full revision

Jesus' reply, "Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the things that are God's." It is the verse most commonly cited in discussions of the relationship between the state and faith, and between the church and politics.

Context

After Jesus entered Jerusalem, the Pharisees, together with the Herodians, sought to entangle him in his talk by asking whether it was lawful to pay tribute to Caesar, the Roman emperor (Matthew 22:15-17). The question was a trap: if he said it was lawful, he would lose the support of a people who resented Roman rule; if he said it was not, he could be accused of rebellion against Rome. Jesus asked them to show him the tribute money and then asked whose "image and superscription" appeared on the denarius. When they answered, "Caesar's," he gave this reply.

Interpretation

  • Two spheres: This reading distinguishes between the legitimate obligations owed to the state, such as taxes, and the worship and obedience owed to God. Martin Luther's doctrine of the two kingdoms is often cited as a development of this distinction.
  • The state under God's sovereignty: Just as Caesar's "image" was stamped on the coin, the image of God is stamped on human beings; on this reading, the verse implies that people themselves belong to God. The Reformed tradition emphasizes that the authority of the state is itself given by God and is legitimate only within those limits (Romans 13:1).
  • Cases of conflict: When the demands of the state conflict with God's commands, the principle "We ought to obey God rather than men" (Acts 5:29) is cited alongside this verse.

Debates and Issues

This verse is frequently invoked in support of the separation of church and state, but views differ on how far the church may speak to political matters. It is cited both by those who hold that the church should keep its distance from politics and by those who argue that, because God's sovereignty extends to every sphere, the church must speak to questions of justice. The Anabaptist tradition has drawn a stricter distinction between state power and the church.

In Korea, this verse figured in the debate during the Japanese colonial period over whether Shinto shrine worship should be regarded as a civic ceremony or as idolatry. More recently, as the taxation of clergy was about to take effect, some argued that it is consistent with this verse for clergy, as citizens, to pay taxes, while others voiced concern that the measure would infringe on the autonomy of the church.

Related Passages

  • Romans 13:1-7
  • Acts 5:29
  • 1 Peter 2:13-17
  • Mark 12:13-17
RevisionTime (UTC)ContributorSummaryStatus
#120632026-11-05 01:48:32AI localizationLocalized for English-speaking readersapproved
#120622026-11-05 01:48:32AI localizationEnglish baseline before localizationapproved